140 0.042 0.271 0.005 3 ↑ 0.028 171 0.182 0.027 0.138 0.022 3 ↓ 0.004 267 0.309 0.248 0.811 0.233 3 ↑ 0.019 376 0.362 0.169 0.109 0.010 3 ↓ 0.120 408 0.400 0.072 0.380 0.165 3 ↓ 0.828 413 0.058 0.011 0.0716 0.002 3 ↑ 0.113 440 0.048 0.004 0.077 0.010 3 ↑ 0.042 458 click here 0.118 0.003 0.102 0.002 3 ↓ 0.015 461 0.051 0.008 0.069 0.006 3 ↑ 0.134 483 0.072 0.005 0.087 0.004 3 ↑ 0.021 515 0.192 0.027 0.255

0.016 3 ↑ 0.079 522 0.410 0.008 0.587 0.081 3 ↑ 0.073 573 0.079 0.008 0.135 0.004 3 ↑ 0.002 659 0.091 0.005 0.107 0.005 3 ↑ 0.115 667 0.140 0.005 0.170 0.012 3 ↑ 0.038 673 0.140 0.027 0.187 0.006 3 ↑ 0.086 680 0.255 0.009 0.302 0.004 3 ↑ 0.006 767 0.062 0.005 0.040 0.012 3 ↓ 0.030 878 0.277 0.086 0.094 0.025 3 ↓ 0.055 895 0.175 0.011 0.114 0.016

3 ↓ 0.011 897 0.181 0.049 0.085 0.011 3 ↓ 0.066 900 0.087 0.008 0.048 0.011 3 ↓ 0.025 903 0.068 0.020 0.152 0.028 3 ↑ 0.086 923 0.070 0.018 0.153 0.031 3 ↑ 0.038 924 0.029 0.006 0.064 0.011 3 ↑ 0.015 941 0.566 0.184 0.078 0.134 3 ↓ 0.114 948 0.080 0.020 0.120 0.008 3 ↑ 0.126 951 0.047 0.021 0.045 0.024 3 ↓ 0.9 1, direction of change of relative spot volume in samples in relation to CHM treatment (C, data from control cells; CMH, data from CMH treated cells). Mwe (kDa) Access keyf High LY3039478 in CMH               267 Vimentin 37 21 189 4.9 54 P20152 522 Malate dehydrogenase – cytoplasmic 21 6 65 6.2 37 Q6PAB3 667 Peroxiredoxin-4 26 6 73 6.8 31 O08807 680 Thioredoxin dependent peroxide reductase 45 9 98 5.9 28 P20108 High in Controls               171 GRP75, 75 kDa glucose

regulated protein precursor 16 10 76 5.8 74 P38674 941 GRP78, 78 kDa glucose regulated protein precursor 24 16 120 4.9 72 P06761 a, The minimum coverage of the matched peptides in relation to the full-length sequence. Moreover, in order to investigate the Idoxuridine relationship between the proteomic spots, identified by the PLS-DA model and the metabolite profile of the myotubes, a PLS2 regression was carried out between the NMR metabolite profile and the 28 differentially regulated spots. Proteomic spots found to be up-regulated with CMH are clearly positively correlated with the NMR signals from creatine (3.05; 3.95-3.99 ppm), while proteomic spots found to be down-regulated with CMH are negatively correlated with these NMR signals. Noticeably, a NMR signal at 2.39 ppm, which is tentatively assigned to malate, is positively correlated with the proteomic spots down-regulated by CMH.