, 2008). Test chemicals are dissolved or uniformly distributed in either physiological saline, 5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in physiological saline, or mineral oils as test solvents, as opposed to culture medium which is often used in cytotoxic tests. This allows for water insoluble materials, acids and amides to be evaluated

(Takahashi et al., 2008), which would otherwise have weakened effects when media is used as a solvent, due to the buffering effect that the media may have. As the name suggests, the exposure time to a given chemical is very short, it is only 5 min, compared to longer exposure times used in the FL assay (15 min) and the neutral red assay (1, 5 or 30 min) (Takahashi et al., 2008) for example. It is believed that that the short exposure is more similar to actual exposure conditions to a consumer Sirolimus product, whilst also providing fast results (Kojima et al., 2013 and Takahashi et al., 2011). This Alisertib purchase also allows the STE to be used for high-throughput screening to evaluate many chemicals. Two different concentrations of the test material are evaluated, 5 and 0.5%, respectively. Post exposure cell viability is compared to a solvent control (relative viability) (OECD, 2014a and Takahashi et al., 2011). If the cell viability is ≤70% at both 0.5 and 5% concentration, then the chemical is classified as GHS Category 1. If cell viability if ≥70% at

both concentrations then the chemical is classified as GHS No Category (OECD, 2014a). The STE was submitted to the OECD in 2011 as a method of high-throughput screening (Kojima et al., 2013) to evaluate minimal, moderate and severe eye irritation. The STE is currently under investigation via the OECD for regulatory acceptance as part of a tiered-testing strategy for either top–down or bottom–up approaches. It is recommended that STE is used for the identification of GHS Category 1, severe irritants and GHS No Category, non-irritants, although in both instances further testing is required to establish a definitive

classification ( OECD, 2014a). It is not recommended for the identification of GHS Category 2 (A or B) chemicals. Penetration of a dye or reagent through a barrier of cells is another approach to assess cytotoxicity selleck chemicals llc (Fig. 6). The FL assay (TG 460, (OECD, 2012c) can reveal the toxic effects of chemicals following a short exposure. A monolayer of Madin–Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells are grown on permeable cell inserts. The test works by measuring the amount of fluorescein leakage through the cell monolayer which can be used to determine the integrity of the barrier formed by the cells. Cytotoxicity would result in an increase in the penetration of fluorescein through the monolayer. Increased in vivo permeability of the corneal epithelium correlates with the degree of inflammation and surface damage as eye irritation occurs.