4A) No PolyPase activity for PolyP-75 was observed,

4A). No PolyPase activity for PolyP-75 was observed, Selleck IWR1 and β-glycerophosphate, PPi, and ATP were only hydrolyzed at trace levels. Accordingly, in vitro assays suggest that agAP was able to hydrolyze endogenous short chain PolyP, but endogenous long chain levels remained unaltered ( Fig. 4B). We then tested whether PolyP stores could be detected in yolk granules suspensions by DAPI-PolyP assay, as PolyP is able to shift DAPI fluorescence emission to a higher wavelength (525–550 nm) that can be detected after blocking the typical blue fluorescence (450 nm) from stained nuclei. Similar to acid phosphatase activity, PolyP signals were mainly observed in small vesicles (Fig. 4D). Nevertheless, weaker signals

were also frequently observed in larger yolk granules. Yolk mobilization of insect eggs is performed by activation

of either cysteine or aspartic protease during embryo development. In RG7204 chemical structure egg extracts of Anticarsia, no aspartic protease activity was detected 24- or 48-h after oviposition (data not shown). On the other hand, hydrolysis of the fluorogenic substrate z-phe-arg-AMC was completely abolished by the cysteine protease inhibitor E-64, suggesting that a cysteine protease is the main active acid protease at this development stage ( Fig. 5A). It has been suggested that inhibition of an aspartic-like protease by PolyP is a control mechanism hindering yolk mobilization during the early development of R. prolixus. In that sense, activation of acid phosphatases would be a triggering mechanism, as yolk mobilization would follow hydrolysis of PolyP and derepression of the aspartic protease. As there is interplay between acid yolk hydrolases (proteases and phosphatases) as described in several insect models ( Purcell et al., 1988, Yamamoto and Takahashi,

1993 and Oliveira et al., 2008), we tested whether a similar mechanism could be observed in Anticarsia. Accordingly, 10 μM of PolyP-3 abolished cysteine protease activity of the 24-h eggs, ( Fig. 5B). Other polymer sizes did not show significant modulation at the tested concentrations. Velvet bean see more caterpillar A. gemmatalis infestations in soybean crops are usually controlled with insecticides, usually combined with the application of nucleopolyhedrovirus ( Negreiro et al., 2004 and Guedes et al., 2012). Nevertheless, Anticarsia defoliation keeps negatively impacting annual crops production, indicating the need for improved control techniques. Also, resistant populations were reported among several pest insects and appearance of resistance has been modeled for A. gemmatalis ( Negreiro et al., 2004). In searching for specific control strategies, the insect reproductive and embryonic physiology is regarded as potential source for new control methods. However, there are few studies on general Anticarsia biology, thus most strategies proposed are based on information derived from other lepidopteran models.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>