Based on the presented analyses, we also want to point out that the genus Arsenophonus is currently paraphyletic due to the two lineages described as separate genera Riesia and Phlomobacter but clustering within the Arsenophonus group (e.g. Figure 2). Two procedures can, in principle, solve this undesirable situation, splitting of the Arsenophonus cluster into several separate genera or classification of all its members within the genus Arsenophonus. Taking into account the phylogenetic arrangement RG-7388 research buy of the individual lineages, the first approach would inevitably lead
to establishment of many genera with low sequence divergences and very similar biology. The second option has been previously mentioned in respect to the genus Phlomobacter [68], and we consider this approach (i.e. reclassification of all members of the Arsenophonus clade within a single genus) a more appropriate solution of the current situation within the Arsenophonus clade. Methods Samples The host species used in this study were acquired from several sources. All of the nycteribiid samples were obtained from Radek Lučan. Most of the hippoboscids were provided by Jan Votýpka. Ant species were collected by Milan Janda in Papua New Guinea. All other samples are from the authors’
collection. List of the sequences included in the Basic matrix is provided in the Additional file5. DNA https://www.selleckchem.com/products/riociguat-bay-63-2521.html extraction, PCR and sequencing The total genomic DNA was extracted from individual samples using DNEasy Tissue Kit (QIAGEN; Hilden, Germany). Primers F40 and R1060 designed to amplify approx. 1020 bp of 16S rDNA, particularly within Enterobacteriaceae [34], were used for all samples. PCR was performed under standard conditions using HotStart Taq polymerase (HotStarTaqi DNA Polymerase, Qiagen). The PCR products were analyzed by gel electrophoresis and cloned into Dichloromethane dehalogenase pGEM-T Easy System 1 vector (Vactosertib nmr Promega). Inserts from selected colonies were amplified using T7 and SP6 primers and sequenced
in both directions, with the exception of 3 fragments sequenced in one direction only (sequences from Aenictus huonicus and Myzocalis sp.). DNA sequencing was performed on automated sequencer model 310 ABI PRISM (PE-Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA) using the BigDye DNA sequencing kit (PE-Biosystems). For each sample, five to ten colonies were screened on average. The contig construction and sequence editing was done in the SeqMan program from the DNASTAR platform (Dnastar, Inc. 1999). Identification of the sequences was done using BLAST, NCBI http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/Blast.cgi. Alignments To analyze thoroughly the behavior of Arsenophonus 16S rDNA and assess its usefulness as a phylogenetic marker, we prepared several matrices and performed an array of phylogenetic analyses on each of them.