Figure 3 Comparison of the size of harvested implanted selleck screening library tumors in nude mice treated with NS, Ad-HK, or Ad-RhoA-RhoC. A: fresh anatomized B: formalin-fixed. Effect

of Ad-RhoA-RhoC on Expression of RhoA and RhoC mRNA in Implanted Tumors PCR product electrophoresis AZD0530 datasheet analysis clearly demonstrated a single RhoA band at 158 bp, RhoC band at 136 bp and GAPDH band at 150 bp, which were the expected sizes (figure not shown). Real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR analyses showed the mRNA levels of RhoA and RhoC were significant decreased in Ad-RhoA-RhoC group compared with the NS group (P < 0.05, Table 1). The relative RhoA and RhoC mRNA expression in Ad-RhoA-RhoC group to the NS group were only about 48% and 43%, respectively. However, there was no significant difference between NS group and Ad-HK group (P > 0.05). The results showed that the RhoA and RhoC genes were specifically silenced in Ad-RhoA-RhoC group. Table 1 The level of RhoA and RhoC transcripts in implanted tumors in different groups. Group RhoA RhoC   ΔΔCT Rel. to NS a ΔΔCT Tanespimycin datasheet Rel. to NS a NS 0 ± 0.22 1 (0.86-1.16) 0 ± 0.26 1 (0.84-1.20) Ad-HK 0.09 ± 0.18 0.94(0.83-1.06) 0.12 ± 0.15 0.92(0.83-1.02) Ad-RhoA-RhoC 1.05 ± 0.27 0.48(0.40-0.58)

1.23 ± 0.14 0.43(0.39-0.47) a. Data are expressed as the mean 2-ΔΔCT (range). Immunohistochemical Staining for RhoA and RhoC in Xenograft Tumor The results of hematoxylin-eosin staining for the pathological changes in tumors were observed under light microscopy (Figure 4). Many necrotic regions were found in the tumors in all the three

groups. But in the Ad-RhoA-RhoC group, cancer cells showed intense positive staining why with smaller cell sizes and contracted nucleus. Immunohistochemical staining results for RhoA and RhoC were shown in Figure 5. In Ad-RhoA-RhoC group, the cancer cells of tumor tissues stained very weakly for RhoA and RhoC, in comparison with NS group and Ad-HK group. Through quantitative data analysis using the Leica Qwin image processing and analysis software (Leica Imaging Solution Lid., Version 3.3.1, Cambridge, UK), the integrated optical density (IOD) values of tumor tissues of NS group, Ad-HK group and Ad-RhoA-RhoC group were 148.02 ± 9.62, 133.44 ± 7.24, 73.51 ± 7.06 for RhoA and 134.53 ± 4.51, 130.74 ± 3.78, 76.23 ± 2.17 for RhoC, respectively.(Figure 5). Figure 4 Tumor tissues in nude mice in different treated groups (HE, ×200) A: NS group; B: Ad-HK group; C: Ad-RhoA-RhoC group. Tumor cells were intensely stained with hematoxylin and showed smaller sizes. Necrotic regions were mainly eosin stained. Figure 5 Immunohistochemistry reaction for RhoA and RhoC protein in implanted tumor tissues of nude mice in different treated groups ( RhoA , ×400, RhoC , ×200). Fig 5 also showed the integrated optical density (IOD) values of the implanted tumor tissues. A: NS group; B: Ad-HK group; C: Ad-RhoA-RhoC group.