Acknowledgments This study was supported by a grant from the Dutch Citarinostat research buy Foundation Institute Gak. Conflict of interest None declared. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. Appendix The Nurses Work Functioning Questionnaire (NWFQ). See Table 5. Table 5

Instructions for sum score calculation Subscales Items Calculation of standardized sum score # of items Total Minimum 1 Cognitive aspects of task execution and general incidents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 15, 16 (sum of item scores * 100)/(# of items × 6) 11 9 2 Impaired decision making 48(R), 49(R), 50(R) (sum of item scores × 100)/(# of items × 4) 3 3 3 Causing incidents at work* selleck compound 14, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 (sum of item scores × 100)/(# of items × 6) 8 6 4 Avoidance behavior 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 (sum of item scores × 100)/(# of items × 4) 8 6 5 Conflicts and irritations with colleagues 33, 34, 35, 44, 45, 46, 47 (sum of item scores × 100)/(# of items × 4) 7 6 6 Impaired contact with patients and their family 10, 11, 12, 13, 22, 23, 24, 25 (sum of item scores × 100)/(# of items × 6) 8 6 7 Lack of energy and motivation 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 (sum of item scores × 100)/(# of items × 6) 5 4 Technical details – Items followed by (R) need

to be recoded before sum score is calculated

– Item score counting starts with 0 on the outer left category, add 1 point for each category further to the right (e.g., disagree = 0; disagree a little = 1; not agree/not disagree = 2; agree a little = 3; agree = 4) – Calculation of standardized sum scores follows the principle: (sum of item scores × 100)/(# of items × maximum score per item) – For sum scores calculation, subjects need to have filled out at least ¾ of all items of Staurosporine solubility dmso a subscale – The range of the standardized sum score is 0–100 for each subscale * The subscale “Causing incidents at work” is not suitable for allied health professionals Electronic supplementary material Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary material 1 (DOC 209 kb) References Aronsson G, Gustafsson K, Dallner M (2000) Sick but yet at work. An ABT 263 empirical study of sickness presenteeism. J Epidemiol Commun Health 54:502–509CrossRef Bartlett MS (1954) A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximation. J R Statist Soc B 16((Series B)):296–298 Bultmann U, Kant I, Kasl SV, Beurskens AJ, van den Brandt PA (2002) Fatigue and psychological distress in the working population: psychometrics, prevalence, and correlates. J Psychosom Res 52:445–452CrossRef Catell RB (1966) The scree test for number of factors. Multivar Behav Res 1:245–276CrossRef Dewa CS, Lin E (2000) Chronic physical illness, psychiatric disorder and disability in the workplace.