cerevisiae and S. pombe? In S. cerevisiae, Dam1 can form MT attachment site if it is targeted by tethering to an ectopic noncentromeric DNA sequence (Kiermaier et al., 2009; Lacefield et al., 2009). It will also be interesting to study what happens if Dam1 is targeted to such an ectopic location in S. pombe or C. albicans where the CEN formation is epigenetically regulated. It is important Selleckchem Crizotinib to note that the localization dependence studies were not performed uniformly as the sensitivity of quantitative measurement techniques improved significantly

over the years. Moreover, the methods used to assay KT localization dependence are sometimes not mentioned clearly, and in many occasions, the methods are rather qualitative than quantitative. For example, the CENP-A independent localization of Mis12 at the CEN in fission yeast has been claimed based on an experiment that was not shown (Takahashi et al., 2000). Unfortunately, this information was cited in several subsequent publications. This unconfirmed observation was sometimes even considered as a variant feature of fission yeast. Similar observations have been reported in localization dependence studies performed in other organisms

as well (Cheeseman et al., 2004; Przewloka et al., 2007). These questions should be readdressed with the Selleckchem Ion Channel Ligand Library help of more sensitive assays in uniform experimental conditions in a variety of model systems. The outcome of these experiments will help us to precisely compare and contrast the KT structure and its function across species. The contrasting

results of an identical question can occur due to the differences in experimental conditions or measurement techniques. For an example, localization dependence of Dsn1 on Mtw1 in S. cerevisiae is contradictory Interleukin-3 receptor in two reports (De Wulf et al., 2003; Pinsky et al., 2003). More quantitative assays to determine the actual scenario are required in such cases to resolve these apparent discrepancies. It is evident that although most of the proteins assemble at the CEN are functionally conserved across species, the CEN DNA is diverged even in closely related species. Comparative genomic analyses in different yeasts revealed that the CEN DNA is hyper-variable even in closely related species (Bensasson et al., 2008; Padmanabhan et al., 2008; Rhind et al., 2011). The phenomenon of hyper-variability of the DNA sequence at the CEN despite its conserved function in chromosome segregation was previously designated as the ‘centromere paradox’ (Henikoff et al., 2001). In this review, we analysed the similarities and differences in the process of KT assembly in yeasts. While the organization of a KT is conserved, there appears to be subtle divergence in regulation of KT assembly in these organisms. Whether this process has evolved uniquely in different organisms to keep pace with the fast evolving CEN DNA is not clear.