Genetic analysis of various TB proteins has confirmed that MPB64 is identical to MPT64, a protein produced by M. tuberculosis. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria do not produce MPB64; it is specifically secreted by M. tuberculosis complex (17–21). MPB64 was first

isolated by Harboe and Nagai in 1986, whereas Li and colleagues identified it as a secreted protein specific to tuberculous mycobacteria in 1993 (7, 3). Hasegawa and colleagues confirmed the high sensitivity and specificity of the Capilia TB assay, which employs an anti-MPB64 monoclonal antibody to detect MPB64 protein and concluded that this assay was useful for the diagnosis of TB (8). In the present study, we LBH589 concentration assayed urine and serum samples obtained from patients with TB in the active and healing phases by the dot-blot method to assess the profile of reactivity with MPB64 antigen. Rashid and colleagues reported that patients admitted to hospital with TB had a mean ESR 97.04 mm/hr, 57.6% being ≥100 mm/hr (22, 23). In the present study, we investigated the correlation between our dot-blot assay and ESR. In one representative patient, the ESR was around 100 mm/hr one month after commencing treatment and gradually decreased from two months. Our dot blot assays showed that both serum and urine samples paralleled the changes in ESR over time (Fig. Nutlin-3a manufacturer 4a, d, e). All patients with

active TB were positive by dot-blot assay of both serum and urine samples and all patients with a strongly positive result had active TB. Thus, a weak reaction on the dot-blot assay suggests TB and a strong reaction indicates active TB. As shown in Figure 6, analysis that included

data obtained from both TB patients and uninfected individuals revealed a strong correlation between the results obtained by dot-blot assay of urine and serum samples (n = 34, r = 0.672). Analysis of TB patients alone revealed an even stronger correlation between results obtained with urine and serum samples (n = 23, r = 0.841) (data not shown). These findings confirm that the results obtained by assay of urine samples are consistent with those for serum samples. In the present study, we evaluated HAS1 the specificity of a dot-blot test for M. tuberculosis infection by comparing data from infected and uninfected individuals and from patients with active and inactive disease. Moreover, the results obtained from urine samples are closely correlated with those obtained from serum samples. Testing of serum is currently the main method for diagnosis of TB. However, there is a need for an assay kit that allows rapid diagnosis of active TB in the field. In particular, a kit for urine testing would be desirable. Collection of urine requires less skill than does collection of blood, has a smaller risk of contamination and requires no special equipment such as centrifuges. Therefore, urine tests are suitable for mass screening.