S reported a low sensitivity of R Ntgenaufnahmen the chest for routine staging, unlike the chest CT, the R Ntgen-thorax with sensitivities GW3965 inhibitor reported to exceed 73%. It seems, however, chest CT, a lower specificity T have, and the results of pulmonary L Discussions with indefinite interpretations remain uncertain cause associated problems, and a thinly Term care for the patient. Previous studies of indeterminate pulmonary nodules, which were Feeder Llig found in a chest CT were primarily in the context of the prime Ren lung cancer. Management indefinite dumplings tchen h depends Of the clinical probability of cancer, such as history asprevious cancer, the patient’s age, smoking history, dumplings tchen size E and density. The authors of these studies suggested the management of indeterminate dumplings tchen as recommended by the Fleischner Society.
Suggest, however, suggest that these recommendations are vague dumplings are tchen in patients with extrapulmonary cancers as the clinical situation must be cloudy with ltigt, and practical guidelines are missing. In these cases GSK1120212 871700-17-3 should consider We know which M Possibilities of metastatic L Emissions and prim Ren lung cancer, and that the monitoring of indeterminate pulmonary nodules are more complex. There are few studies of indeterminate pulmonary nodules in extrapulmonary cancers, including cancer of the head and neck, breast and colon cancer in particular. Brent et al. reported that 45 of 439 patients with colorectal carcinoma diagnosed indefinite Lungenl sions had. In addition Kronawitter et al.
conducted a retrospective analysis of 202 patients with potentially resectable liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma, and reported a 30% rate of indeterminate pulmonary nodules. However, chest CT showed a gr Ere undetermined number of nodes in our study. One reason for this difference, the h HIGHEST Aufl Be carried out measurement of the last CT compared to CT in the 1990s and early 2000s. CT with h Herer Aufl Solution could make smaller dumplings and k tchen nnte In h Cause higher sensitivity. Another reason may be that our study was limited to patients with cancer of the rectum. Because rectal cancer is more likely to be solitary Ren lung metastases associated to cancer c Lon, our study with rectal cancer can not prove an h Here Incidence of lung nodules in comparison to the other side are including normal c Cancer .
lon Despite the differences in the incidence, our results agree with previous studies. Brent et al. have reported that 16.7% of patients with indeterminate Lungenl Ver sions changes were apart and was best firmed that lung metastases. They found that the risk factor was responsible for the progression of small indefinite L Lesions in the lymph node metastasis positive status in rectal cancer. We also found that the risk factors for metastasis in patients with indeterminate pulmonary nodules the size E of pulmonary nodules and a positive lymph node status in rectal cancer. In our study, the most indeterminate lung nodules are benign and only 10.2% were best as metastases CONFIRMS. Therefore, we postulate that routinely Owned monitoring for an indefinite time no lung nodules. Intensive follow-up chest CT scan or other invasive diagnostic procedures should be considered only in patients with big s pulmonary nodules or positive nod