In fact, Equations 58 and 59 are the same as the classically predicted amount of charges q cl,1 and q cl,2 in C 1 and C 2 in the original system, respectively. If we consider that α j are given by Equation 36, q cl,1 and q cl,2 can be rewritten, after a little evaluation, in the form (64) (65) We illustrated q cl,1 and q cl,2 in Figure 4 as a function of time. To understand the time PCI-34051 research buy behavior of these quantities, it may be worth to recall that complementary functions, q j c (t), and particular solutions, q j p (t), are not associated to the original system but to the firstly transformed system. We can also easily

confirm from similar evaluation that the time click here behavior of

canonical conjugate currents p cl,j are represented in terms of q j c (t), p j c (t), and p j p (t) (see Appendix Appendix 4). Figure 4 Classically predicted amount of charges in capacitors. This illustration represents the time behavior of q cl,1 (thick solid line) and q cl,2 (dashed line) where R 0 = R 1 = R 2 = 0.1, L 0 = L 1 = L 2 = 1, C 1 = 1, C 2 = 1.2, q 1c (0) = q 2c (0) = 0.5, p 1c (0) = p 2c (0) = 0, and δ = 0. The values of are (0,0) (a), (10,4) (b), and (0.5,0.53) see more (c). The definition of quantum fluctuations for any quantum operator in the DSN is given by (66) Using this, we obtain the fluctuations of charges and currents as (67) (68) (69) (70) As we have seen before, the expectation values associated to charges and currents are represented in terms of complementary functions, q j c (t) and p j c (t), and

particular solutions q j p (t) and p j p (t). The amplitude of complementary functions Gefitinib in vivo is determined from the strength of displacements, whereas the particular solutions are determined by the power source (see Equations 19 and 20). However, all of the fluctuations do not involve such solutions. This means that the displacement and the electric power source do not affect to the fluctuations of charges and currents. The uncertainty products between charges and their conjugate currents can be easily identified by means of Equations 67 to 70. For the case of the DN that are given from the limit r 1=r 2→0, we have F 1=F 2=0 and . Then, the uncertainty products become (71) (72) These are the same as the uncertainty products in the number states and are always larger than , preserving the uncertainty principle. Thus, we can conclude that the uncertainty products in the DN are the same as those of the ordinary number states. Evidently, the uncertainty principle is inherent in quantum mechanical context described by canonical variables. The results, Equations 71 and 72 with n 1=n 2=0, are exactly the same as Equations 29 and 30 of [4], respectively. Moreover, for R 1=R 2=R 3→0 (i.e.