Intestinal inflammation

involves a rapid accumulation of learn more neutrophils at the colonic mucosa. The transmigrating neutrophils rapidly deplete oxygen in the local microenvironment, stabilizing intestinal epithelial HIF levels. Mice with chronic granulomatous disease, deficient in reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, have exaggerated neutrophil recruitment and colitis, but pharmacological HIF stabilization with AKB-4924 protected these animals from severe colitis [112]. For viral infections, the landscape may be more complicated. On the one hand, HIF is a positive regulator of key immune response effectors against viral infections, just as against bacterial ones. On the other hand, since high HIF levels encourage see more BAY 11-7082 order certain lysogenic viruses to become lytic, activating HIF may potentially influence reactivation phenotypes. Also, HIF treatment in vivo could influence the antiviral activity of plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs), and one group has shown that HIF-1α is a negative regulator of pDC development in vitro and in vivo [113]. The work in APCs suggests that HIF elevation could be

effective not only in treating but also in preventing disease, through examination of adjuvant characteristics. To take advantage of the positive role of HIF in innate immune cells and avoid the negative effect of HIF on T cells, a HIF-stabilizing agent would have to be effective in the first hours of the immune response, but be exhausted by 24–48 h after immune stimulation when T cells begin activating. We have recently reported [114] proof-of-concept experiments using the HIF stabilizer AKB-4924 to strengthen the response to vaccination with ovalbumin, a model antigen. In this work, DC of mice treated with AKB-4924 showed increased MHC and co-stimulatory molecule expression and induced greater GPX6 T-cell proliferation, and higher titers of antibodies were generated in

mice provided the HIF-1 stabilizing agent. Further research must be done to determine whether a HIF–1 boosting drug could be developed fruitfully as a vaccine adjuvant. It is important to recognize that both HIF-1α and HIF-2α are expressed in myeloid cells, and many drugs, including iron-chelating agents such as mimosine and desferioxamine, that target HIF-1 would affect HIF-2 similary. A potential exception to this rule is AKB-4924, which appears to preferentially stabilize HIF-1α [44]. The conclusions in this review were drawn based mostly on work that exclusively analyzed HIF-1α without specific analysis performed to ascertain changes in HIF-2α level. While HIF-1 and HIF-2 have different tissue expression patterns and play distinct roles in several processes such as embryonic development and iron homeostasis [115], but their roles in the immune response to infection appear to be very similar (our own unpublished data and [115, 116]).