The mouse model that we chose to use in this study was simply based on the fact that FVB mice are a very commonly used mouse model used in research. We were not attempting to select a strain that would be more or less susceptible to diet-induced obesity or IR. Recent work by Montgomery et al examined strain-dependent variations in obesity and glucose management, including the

FVB mouse strain as well as 4 other commonly used mouse models [30]. Their results do not suggest that the FVB mouse strain is unusually susceptible or resistant to diet-induced obesity or IR. Thus, the AZD1208 research buy apparent strain-dependent differences of increased IF intake that we observed compared with previous studies are something that need further NVP-BKM120 investigation. The second potential limitation of our study concerns the somewhat small sample size used in some of the comparisons that were made. Although a power analysis was performed with anticipated variability, we experienced somewhat more variability than what was expected for some of our measures. One comparison that deserves attention is the GTT. Our analysis revealed a tendency for improved glucose tolerance with high IF and SMSC intake compared with high SMSC intake alone. With a greater sample size, this comparison may yield a significant benefit of increased IF intake on glucose management consistent with our original hypothesis.

However, this extrapolation is difficult to support when the entirety of our findings with respect to high IF intake is considered. Firstly, we

did not observe an effect of IF on the impaired fasting glucose induced by SMSC intake. Second, the basal AMPK activation or signaling was not elevated with increased IF (in fact, impaired AMPK activation was observed with IF in several tissues). Lastly, increased IF in our MycoClean Mycoplasma Removal Kit animal model did not cause a reduction in body fat accumulation as others have reported. Another potential limitation of our study concerns the modest nature of our dietary protocol. Our study was not performed using a diet that would be expected to cause metabolic stress known to lead to IR. The value of our findings certainly apply to a baseline effect of increased SMSC or IF intake on glucose management and AMPK signaling. We fully expect that future studies examining the impact of SMSC and/or IF intake in the context of a high-fat diet may yield different results that would expand on the work we present here. In summary, the purpose of our study was to examine the effects of supplemental SMSC and/or dietary IF on basal glucose regulation and AMPK activation. Certain forms of Se have shown deleterious effects on blood glucose, whereas IF have reportedly shown potential insulin-sensitizing properties. Based on work done by others, we hypothesized that SMSC, an organic source of Se abundant in food, would result in impaired glucose regulation, and dietary IF would ameliorate SMSC-induced aberrations.