These selleck inhibitor contour maps indicate the regions where differences in molecular fields are associated with differences in biological activity. Green contours indicate regions in which increasing steric bulk is tolerable, and yellow contours indicate regions in which the steric bulk decreases the activity. In the β1 model the steric contours show that the substituents attached to the ring of the arylethanolamine group are placed in sterically unfavorable regions. Of the four yellow contours near the arylethanolamine group three of them are below the local plane of the reference compound and one is above the five-membered ring of the reference compound. These yellow regions indicate

that additional steric interactions in these regions would lead to Selleck Trichostatin A decreased biological www.selleckchem.com/products/AG-014699.html activity. The above observations indicate that for good β1-agonistic activity there should be only very small groups or no substituents on the aryl ring of arylethanolamine. These can account for a limiting size and shape for the substituents that would be effective for tight binding to the receptor. A big

yellow contour above the indole ring indicates that any substituents on the nitrogen of the indole ring would greatly reduce the biological activity, suggesting limited bulk tolerance. The small green region at the C7 position of the indole nucleus indicates that increases in the steric bulk at this position are marginally favorable for β1-AR activity. The electrostatic contour map (Fig. 5a) of the CoMFA model shows a small blue contour near the SO2 group attached to arylethanolamine aminophylline and red contours near the C7 substituents on the indole ring. This indicates that a reduction in the electronegativity near the SO2 group and increasing electronegativity at the C7 position of indole should lead to increased β1 activity. Fig. 4 CoMFA steric STDEV*COEFF contour plots of the tryptamine-based derivative training set generated for the β1 (a), β2 (b), and β3 (c) models. Compounds 16 (a, c) and 20 (b) are shown inside the field Fig. 5 CoMFA electrostatic

STDEV*COEFF contour plots of the tryptamine-based derivative training set generated for the β1 (a), β2 (b), and β3 (c) models. Compounds 16 (a, c) and 20 (b) are shown inside the field CoMFA of the β2-adrenoceptor The β2 CoMFA analysis based on the fit atom alignment yielded good cross-validated (\( r^2_\textcv = 0. 5 9 5 \)) and conventional \( r^2 \left(r^2 = 0. 9 7 6. \;F – \texttest value = 90. 5 1 8 \right) \), with the optional number of components found to be five. The steric and electrostatic fields contribute to the QSAR equation by 39.4% and 60.6%, respectively. A high bootstrapped (10 sampling) \( r^2_\textbs \) value of 0.997 (SEE = 0.023, std dev = 0.003) was found. A plot of actual versus calculated biological activity obtained from the analysis is given in Fig. 3b.