With substantial evidence that hunter-gatherer, pastoral, and agricultural peoples have profoundly altered terrestrial and marine ecosystems for millennia (Redman, 1999, Kirch, 2005 and Erlandson and Rick, 2010), archeology provides unique tools to help contextualize human–environmental interactions in the past and present. This deep historical record also supplies insights that can assist modern conservation biology, restoration, and management (Lotze et al., 2011, Lyman, 2012, Rick and

Lockwood, 2013, Wolverton and Lyman, 2012, Lyman, 2006 and Wolverton et al., 2011). In this paper, we evaluate the Anthropocene concept by investigating archeological and historical data from islands around the world. Selleck MEK inhibitor Globally, islands and archipelagos are often important reservoirs of biological and ecological

diversity. Archeologically, Lumacaftor price islands offer a means to evaluate human environmental interactions on a circumscribed and smaller scale than continents. As Kirch, 1997 and Kirch, 2004 noted, islands often serve as microcosms of the larger processes operating on continents. Once viewed as scientific laboratories and more recently as model systems (see Evans, 1973, Kirch, 2007, Fitzpatrick and Anderson, 2008 and Vitousek, 2002), islands around the world have been inhabited by humans for millennia and have long been affected by human activities, including over-exploitation, burning and landscape clearance, the introduction of exotic flora and/or fauna, and increased productivity (Kirch, 2005, Erlandson and Fitzpatrick, 2006, Fitzpatrick and Keegan, 2007 and McGovern et al., 2007). As some scholars have noted, the generally

more limited terrestrial biodiversity and circumscription on islands have made human impacts more obvious than those on continents (Grayson, 2001, Steadman and Martin, 2003 and Wroe et al., 2006). There are also examples of people actively managing or enhancing ecosystems on islands and continents, and researchers are now revisiting classic cases of human environmental degradation, including Rapa Nui (Easter Island; Hunt and Lipo, 2009) Teicoplanin and the Maya collapse at Copan (McNeil et al., 2010), demonstrating the complexities of environmental change and the role of people in influencing such changes and responding to them. Much remains to be learned about the implications of island archeology and paleoecology for helping understand the potential environmental, social, and political consequences of the Anthropocene. After reviewing the chronology of human settlement of islands around the world, we present case studies from three heavily studied island groups. These include Polynesia occupied by maritime agriculturalists, the Caribbean occupied by agriculturalists and hunter-gatherers, and California’s Channel Islands occupied entirely by hunter-gatherers. We explore three interrelated questions.