01; Figure  4A) and FC-IBC-02 (P < 0 01; Figure  4C) However, th

01; Figure  4A) and FC-IBC-02 (P < 0.01; Figure  4C). However, the difference was not statistically significant compared with AZD8931 alone. Figure 4 AZD8931 inhibits the growth of SUM149 and FC-IBC-02 cells in vivo in SCID mice. SUM149 (A) and FC-IBC-02 (C) cells were orthotopically transplanted into the mammary fat

pads of SCID mice. Animals were randomized into groups (n = 5/group) when tumor volumes were approximately 50–80 mm3. AZD8931 was BGB324 concentration given by oral gavage at doses of 25 mg/kg per day, 5 days/week for 4 weeks. Paclitaxel was given twice weekly by subcutaneously injection at 10 mg/kg for 4 weeks. The mean tumor volumes were measured at the time points indicated. In SUM149 xenografts (A), *P < 0.01 (vs. control), **P = 0.01 (vs. paclitaxel + AZD8931). In FC-IBC-02 xenografts (C), *P < 0.001 (vs. control), **P < 0.01 (vs. paclitaxel + AZD8931). SUM149 (B) and FC-IBC-02 (D), the size of CHIR98014 order tumors was measured by weights (mg) after tumors were removed from Selleckchem Luminespib mice at the end of experiments. The data shown represent the mean of tumor weights with SD. *P < 0.05 (vs. control); **P < 0.01 compared to control. The combination of paclitaxel + AZD8931 compared with paclitaxel (P = 0.008, SUM149; P = 0.001, FC-IBC-02). In addition, we also examined the weight of xenografted tumors at the end of study. The inhibitory

pattern of tumor size following different treatments was very similar to that seen in tumor growth curves in both IBC models. The combination of paclitaxel + AZD8931 was more effective at RAS p21 protein activator 1 reducing tumor sizes than all of the other treatment groups. The difference was also significant for paclitaxel + AZD8931 versus paclitaxel alone in

SUM149 (P = 0.008; Figure  4B) and FC-IBC-02 (P = 0.001; Figure  4D) models. Compared with AZD8931 alone, the difference was marginally significant for SUM149 tumors (P = 0.056) and FC-IBC-02 tumors (P = 0.07).Finally, we examined the expression of total EGFR, HER2, HER3, phosphorylated EGFR, phosphorylated HER2, and phosphorylated HER3 in SUM149 xenografted tumors by immunohistochemistry. As expected, high level expression of EGFR and low levels of HER2 and HER3 expression were observed in both AZD8931-treated and control tumors. The expression of phosphorylated EGFR, HER2, and HER3 was inhibited in AZD8931-treated tumors compared with control tumors (Figure  5A). The average of pathologist’s H-score for both membrane and cytoplasmic staining was shown in Figure  5B. Together, we conclude that AZD8931 significantly inhibits tumor growth in HER2 non-amplified IBC xenograft models by inhibiting EGFR, HER2 and HER3 phosphorylation. The combination of paclitaxel + AZD8931 was more effective than single agent paclitaxel or AZD8931 alone at delaying tumor growth. Figure 5 AZD8931 inhibits EGFR pathway protein expression in vivo . A.

Comments are closed.