J Mol Biol 1996, 263:525–530 CrossRefPubMed 24 Senes A, Gerstein

J Mol Biol 1996, 263:525–530.CrossRefPubMed 24. Senes A, Gerstein M, Engelman DM: Statistical analysis of amino acid patterns in transmembrane helices: the GxxxG motif occurs frequently and in association with β-branched residues at neighboring positions. J Mol Biol 2000, 296:921–936.CrossRefPubMed 25. Russ WP, Engelman DM: The GxxxG motif: a framework for transmembrane helix-helix association. J Mol Biol 2000, Selleckchem ��-Nicotinamide 296:911–919.CrossRefPubMed 26. Kleiger G, Grothe R,

Mallick P, Eisenberg D: GXXXG and AXXXA: common α-helical interaction motifs in proteins, particularly in extremophiles. Biochemistry 2002, 41:5990–5997.CrossRefPubMed 27. Pace CN, Scholtz JM: A helix propensity scale based on experimental studies of peptides and proteins. Biophys J 1998, 75:422–427.CrossRefPubMed 28. Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A: EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends Genet 2000, 16:276–277.CrossRefPubMed 29. Needleman

SB, Cediranib Wunsch CD: A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J Mol Biol 1970, 48:443–453.CrossRefPubMed 30. Notredame C, Higgins DG, Heringa J: T-Coffee: a novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J Mol Biol 2000, 302:205–217.CrossRefPubMed 31. Lifson S, Sander C: Specific recognition in the tertiary structure of β-sheets of proteins. J Mol Biol 1980, 139:627–639.CrossRefPubMed 32. Wouters MA, Curmi PM: An analysis of side chain interactions and pair correlations within antiparallel β-sheets: the differences between backbone hydrogen-bonded and non-hydrogen-bonded residue pairs. Proteins 1995, 22:119–131.CrossRefPubMed 33. Roussel A, Cambillau C: TURBO-FRODO. Silicon Graphics, Mountain View, CA 1991. 34. DeLano WL: The PyMol molecular graphics system. DeLano Scientific, Palo Alto, CA 2002. 35. Cuff JA, Clamp ME, Siddiqui AS, Finlay M, HM781-36B ic50 Barton GJ: JPred: a consensus secondary structure prediction server. Bioinformatics 1998, 14:892–893.CrossRefPubMed 36. McGuffin LJ, Bryson K, Jones DT: The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server. Bioinformatics 2000, 16:404–405.CrossRefPubMed 37. Kneller DG, Cohen FE, Langridge R: Improvements in Carbohydrate protein

secondary structure prediction by an enhanced neural network. J Mol Biol 1990, 214:171–182.CrossRefPubMed 38. PROF – secondary structure prediction system[http://​www.​aber.​ac.​uk/​~hiwww/​prof/​] 39. Pollastri G, Przybylski D, Rost B, Baldi P: Improving the prediction of protein secondary structure in three and eight classes using recurrent neural networks and profiles. Proteins 2002, 47:228–235.CrossRefPubMed Authors’ contributions BT devised and implemented the database extraction procedures and the statistical tests. SM identified the FliH repeats and preliminary statistical preferences for positions x1 to x3. Both authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript and in preparation of figures. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Comments are closed.