Restoration investments will likely be made preferentially for those opportunities where benefits are VX-809 greater, likelihood of success are higher, and costs are lower. Benefits include recovery of ecosystem services, contribution to corporate culture, or restoration of habitats of particular scientific, cultural, and, in effect, biophilic value [56]. As noted, restoration may also be undertaken simply to improve knowledge of potential restoration methods. Not all deep-sea restoration opportunities will generate large ecological or human benefits in the short-term. The Darwin Mounds and Solwara 1 habitats cover relatively

small areal extents but support communities of organisms that garner attention and make them good case studies for thinking about the potential for ecological restoration. On a very different scale are manganese nodule beds, which cover huge expanses of the seafloor. Early estimates suggested a single commercial mining effort might plow up to1 km2 per day or, over a decade, an area the size of Germany [3]; more recent estimates suggest a rate sixty times slower than this (Parianos, pers. comm., Nautilus Minerals). Nodules take millennia to form and the biota associated selleck chemicals with manganese nodule beds is relatively obscure and non-charismatic, but their contribution to biotic diversity is very high. How do we begin to contemplate restoration of nodule beds, bearing in mind factors such as these?

In such a case, restoration simply may not be the optimal goal or tool for environmental management. Costs of deep-sea restoration are expected to be high, but the magnitude in difference between costs of shallow-water vs. deep-sea restoration projects has not been calculated for realistic scenarios. Acetophenone To this end, participants at the Sète Workshop also developed estimates of the cost per hectare to implement experimental deep-sea restoration in the scenarios described above. These costs are then compared to those of saltmarsh and shallow-water coral restoration projects. The Darwin Mounds are located off the coast of Scotland

[57], where bottom trawling has damaged some mounds of stony coral [52] and [58] such that little remains of the original corals but mobile beds of rubble [4]. A hypothetical pilot restoration project is described here with the goal of reestablishing the destroyed reef structure. It does not take into account major geoengineering of the seabed that might be required to reconstruct the elevated sandbanks upon which the corals occurred originally. The project would use a laboratory propagation-and-transplant protocol within an adaptive management framework to test the efficacy of coral transplants at two densities (10 and 20 1-m2 patches of corallites distributed over a 10-m×10-m area of former coral reef, three replicates of each density; i.e., total area under experimental restoration would be 600 m2 or 0.06 ha).